Skip to main content
Notes is where you write, with a list on the left, an editor on the right, and two characters that separate this from a text file, since typing @ cites a source from your library and typing [[ links another of your notes. Those two keystrokes are the whole case for writing here instead of somewhere else, because a note that knows which papers it came from and which other notes it relates to can be found again in a year, whereas a note in a folder cannot. Your advisor also reads your notes, so what you work out here shapes what it says back to you. A literature note open in the editor, linked to its source, with the advisor margin above the toolbar.

Two kinds of note

The list keeps Literature notes apart from Research notes. A literature note is about a source, covering what this paper argues, what is wrong with it and what you would use it for, while a research note is your own thinking, whether that is an idea, an argument taking shape, a method decision or a chunk of a chapter you are working through. Respect the distinction, because you use them differently: literature notes pile up while you read and get consulted while you write, whereas research notes are where the thinking happens and are usually what you come back for.

Writing

A title, a section, and the body. Sections tag a note against the shape of your thesis. A new project starts with Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References and Other, but the list is yours: rename Methods to Chapter 2, add Fieldwork, or drop what your discipline does not use. You can do all of this under Note sections in the project settings. The list’s order is the display order everywhere. Filing consistently pays off in the notes list, where you can filter by section and group the whole list by section instead of by day, which turns “show me everything I have written toward Methods” into a question you can actually answer. A note you have not filed yet simply has no section, and removing a section always asks where its notes should go. The editor handles headings, lists, tables, mathematics, code and images, saving as you go and telling you when it last saved, while Focus mode (⌘B / Ctrl+B) hides the list and everything else, leaving the text. Learn that one.

Version history and restoring earlier work

The Version history button opens the note’s creation date and author, followed by saved revisions with their dates, authors, and change sizes. You can also open it by clicking the note’s Created date. Compare shows a revision against the current note. Restore asks for confirmation before copying that revision’s title and content into the live note as a new revision. Autosave keeps your current writing saved as you work. History is a coarser record: automatic checkpoints are created on saves at most once every 30 seconds, and the newest 50 unpinned automatic checkpoints are retained. It is not a record of every keystroke or every autosave. Restoring preserves the selected revision by pinning it, and the new restore revision is also kept outside the automatic-checkpoint limit. Existing history is not erased by restoring, though ordinary automatic checkpoints remain subject to retention. If the note changed elsewhere, Quester stops the restore and shows a conflict so you can review the newer work.

Citing a source: @

Type @ and a picker opens over your library, and picking a source puts the citation in, live-linked to the record. A research note with two live citations in its text and a note link, and the @ picker open below listing sources as in-text citations. The payoff arrives later, when hovering a citation shows you the source and this note appears under In your project on the source’s own page. You never reconstruct which paper a claim came from, and reconstructing that is the most tedious hour of writing a literature review. You can also attach a source to a whole note with Link a source, which suits a literature note that is about one paper instead of merely citing it.

Linking a note: [[

Type [[ and pick another note, which is how an argument gets assembled from pieces instead of trapped inside one long document. Hover a link to peek at the target without leaving what you are writing, and follow it when you want to. Form this habit: when you catch yourself restating something you wrote before, link it instead of restating it. Over three years that turns a heap of notes into a structure, and the structure is what you have to work with when it comes time to write.

The advisor in the margin

While you write, your advisor may leave a short note in the margin about what you are working on, in the context of your sources and questions, and dismissing it makes it go. It does not write for you and it does not edit your text, but reads over your shoulder, which is as much as a good advisor does while you are drafting.

Finding notes again

Search the list by title and content, and filter by kind, Literature or Research. Every note has its own URL (/project/:id/desk/notes/:noteId), so you can link to one from anywhere, including your own writing outside Quester, and notes also turn up in ⌘K search from anywhere in the app.

What to actually write here

Two rules survive a long project. Write the note when you have the thought. The observation you had on page four of a paper is gone by page nine, which is why you read with the editor open, and three lines with an @ citation beat the perfect summary you never got round to writing. Write for the version of you who has forgotten everything. “Interesting” tells you nothing in a year, whereas “contradicts Fairclough on sampling: they used purposive, this is convenience, and the effect size difference may come from that” still works in five. Next: Questions.
Last modified on September 6, 2026